latest 20 messages by sim642
+
[2016-07-11T20:50:25Z]
sim642
Josay, there's a "contact github" button at the bottom
+
[2016-07-11T19:26:00Z]
sim642
If they have analytics gathering all kinds of very detailed timing data it'd be possible to tell how much slowness it has introduced
+
[2016-07-11T19:21:18Z]
sim642
Out of everything the issue list looks the most hideous
+
[2016-07-11T19:18:59Z]
sim642
I guess not
+
[2016-07-11T19:18:58Z]
sim642
Oh god, I was about to ask if I was the only one having the font change
+
[2016-05-29T14:59:58Z]
sim642
Nevermind, I don't think users even have webhooks
+
[2016-05-29T14:58:46Z]
sim642
dmko, You set it up for your github user not a specific repository?
+
[2016-04-22T07:37:57Z]
sim642
or that API page is paginated
+
[2016-04-22T07:37:31Z]
sim642
it counts forks of forks too maybe, not sure how it works exactly
+
[2016-03-15T08:00:11Z]
sim642
I have a question of my own: can one commit close more then one issue with the message
+
[2016-03-15T07:59:15Z]
sim642
grandrew: if it's generated, don't you have the source right in the gh-pages branch?
+
[2016-03-15T07:58:20Z]
sim642
By opening pull requests
+
[2016-03-06T11:33:04Z]
sim642
right, I guess it could allow abuse too easily
+
[2016-03-06T11:31:53Z]
sim642
or I have to manually modify each page on the website separately
+
[2016-03-06T11:31:32Z]
sim642
Can non-collaborators push to the wiki pages' git repo?
+
[2016-03-05T13:54:49Z]
sim642
I'd suffix the respective branch with like -bugfix or -hotfix or whatnot
+
[2016-03-05T13:54:14Z]
sim642
naming them the same is not a great idea, just leads to confusion
+
[2016-02-27T19:55:33Z]
sim642
reverts are preferred because they don't delete history but rather reverse changes in new commits
+
[2016-02-27T19:55:01Z]
sim642
they're two different things in git
+
[2016-02-27T19:54:57Z]
sim642
but if you reverted you wouldn't need it, you did a reset, not a revert